P/REVIEW: black midi at Paradise Rock Club (7/21/22)

Paradise Rock Club, July 21. Doors at 7, show at 8. $30. Tickets available here.

I don’t really get this picture, either.

It was only a matter of seconds of first pushing play on black midi‘s 2021 album Cavalcade [Rough Trade] that I thought, “King Crimson. ’21st Century Schizoid Man’.”

Thus, it was in the pleasantly so sense of the word that I was surprised that they had released a cover of that KC song earlier this year. The EP that it is on, Cavalcovers, also includes a Captain Beefheart song, which in retrospect hardly comes as a shock. The other song contained therein, however, is unexpected in all possible regards.

The song on the aforementioned album that provided me with my initial impression of black midi was the single “John L.” If you are wondering why the title guy is repeatedly referred to as “John 50,” consider that there are cases in which “L” is not a letter but a numeral.

The other two singles pulled from Cavalcade, “Slow” and “Chondromalacia Patella,” are further instances of sonic bombardment in the prog rock/jazz fusion vein. Both are as unlikely as “John L” to attract the ears of listeners who don’t have the head start of having immersed themselves in the less-than-radio-ready music that influenced black midi. (In addition to King Crimson, other band names that are dropped in reviews include Can, The Fall, and Primus.)

Hellfire (Rough Trade), black midi’s third album (2019’s Schlagenheim [also Rough Trade] preceded Cavalcade), dropped last Friday. The sometimes cacophonic barrage is still there, but the collection also ups the jazz rock ante quite a bit. Still (which happen to be the title of one it’s songs), the 10 tracks clock in at a digestibly compact 39 minutes.

Reviewers have certainly turned some phrases in their assessment of Hellfire, be it Guardian critic Alex Petridis’s not-so-complimentary (depending on one’s perspective) comparison to the “the more headache-inducing bits of the Mahavishnu Orchestra’s jazz-fusion classic Birds of Fire,” or the NME’s more generous praising of its “zippy jazz, murky post-punk and opiated, dreamy psychedelia” (Andy Price) and Exclaim!’s appreciation of how the “crisp production magnifies every jeered note and impulse crash” (Sydney Brasil).

I am bit loath to describe any artist as love ‘em or hate ‘em, so let’s just say that black midi kinds of listeners will probably not be able to get enough, while pretty much everyone else likely won’t care enough to listen beyond whatever small portions that they are willing sample.

But as the band said in a 2019 interview, ​”​All great art comes from self-indulgence.​”​ And whatever one thinks of their music, Black Midi are certainly to be given credit for milking that mantra for all it’s worth.

Asked & Answered: Ian Anderson (Lynn Happens Q&A, 10/27/14)

Ian Anderson turns 74 today. I realize that being a fan of Jethro Tull in the ’90s didn’t exactly make me the coolest kid at Lancaster [OH] High School. But I had plenty working against me in that regard already, so I felt perfectly free to embrace my love of albums that were released before I was born and included unsegmented 40-minute “songs”. Here is the interview that I did with Mr. Anderson in 2014 for LynnHappens.com.

In February 1968, MGM Records released a single called “Sunshine Day,” which they credited to the band Jethro Toe. Thankfully, the song did not become a massive hit. Otherwise, the British music magazine Melody Maker would have voted Jethro Toe the #2 band of the following year, smack dab in between The Beatles and The Rolling Stones and with The Who suffocating in its wake. Jethro Toe would have also been the band that scored back-to-back chart-toppers in the United States with albums that each consisted of a continuous forty-something-minute song. And neither last nor least, Jethro Toe – quite possibly the most artistically and commercially successful progressive rock band of the 1970s – would have beaten out Metallica and AC/DC for the Best Hard Rock/Metal Performance Grammy. (Hey, a flute rocks pretty hard as a lead instrument, you know.)

Of course, it was the correctly named Jethro Tull that became arguably (but briefly) the most popular band in the world in the early 1970s. Spearheaded by singer and flautist Ian Anderson, the group named after an 18th century agriculturalist and inventor incorporated elements of blues, jazz, classical, rock, and folk into its heady prog-rock brew.

Despite a slew of personnel changes and diminishment as a commercial force, Jethro Tull continued to record and tour throughout the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2010, Ian Anderson has released two albums under his own name: Thick As A Brick 2, a sequel to the 1972 masterpiece that included lyrics that Anderson credited to a fictional 8-year-old boy named Gerald Bostock; and this year’s Homo Erraticus, which includes liner notes signed by the grown-up (and still made-up) Mr. Bostock.

Anderson’s current tour is divided into segments devoted to Homo Erraticus and the best of Jethro Tull. Those who fancy hearing what the former sounds like and what the latter includes should proceed to Lynn Auditorium on Saturday, November 1, where Anderson will be joined by bandmates Florian Opahle (electric guitar), Scott Hammond (drums), John O’Hara (keyboards), David Goodier (bass), and Ryan O’Donnell (vocals, theatrical input).

Lynn Happens recently spoke to Ian Anderson by phone about his music, his thoughts on the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and whether or not he will be visiting an old colleague who lives in Marblehead.

Blake Maddux: Have you ever met or otherwise been made aware of anyone named Gerald Bostock?

Ian Anderson: Um, I don’t believe that I have, but there was a boy at our school called Bostock. That’s where I got the name from when I came to write Thick As A Brick. I remembered the name of one of our schoolboys from our school in the north of England, Bostock being a fairly common name in counties like Yorkshire in the north of England. So, that’s where the name came from.

Maddux: Does your opinion what constitutes “the best of Jethro Tull” differ from that of audiences?

Anderson: I think if you took, you know, 10 people in the audience and asked them to write their version of their 20 favorite songs of Jethro Tull, you would find some common ground. But you would probably end up with a top 100 not a top 20. People have their own ideas, and my job is to try and balance the heavy hitters and the iconic songs that people expect to hear and I, too, expect to play because I like doing them. But I also have to try and put in a few things that are a perhaps bit a bit more unusual from the back catalog, maybe things I haven’t played for many, many years, or perhaps even haven’t played at all live. So I try and mix it up a little bit and come up with what I think is a good balance. But to go out and campaign amongst the attention of the audience, you’d have to write a special computer program to make any sense of it. It would be so varied.

Maddux: Is there a difference between fans in Europe and fans in America on that question?

Anderson: Well, it varies a little bit. There are certain songs that I think were particularly popular in the U.S.A., like “Teacher” or “Bungle in the Jungle,” but weren’t necessarily so popular in Europe because their popularity in the U.S. was as a result of getting a lot of radio play. But in Europe we don’t really have radio play for rock music to any great extent.

If you went to Germany, you’d probably find the songs from the Broadsword [and the Beast] album in 1982 were very popular with the German audience but wouldn’t necessarily be popular with the U.S. audience because that album didn’t really resonate with our audience in the U.S.A. very much. So there are differences. I guess you’ll find to a fairly strong degree most people would generally be in agreement with, you know, the more obvious things. Of course audiences are different everywhere you go, but they’re not rabidly different.

Maddux: What do you think is the most underappreciated album that you have ever recorded?

Anderson: I suppose at the time the album A Passion Play was one that probably got a lot of notoriety and probably turned off a lot of fans who found it too detailed and confusing. But over the years it’s somehow regained its poise within the Jethro Tull repertoire and for a lot of people it’s their number one favorite Jethro Tull album these days. So, you know, things do come and go in terms of the perception of them in that historical sense. But, you know, there are albums that, I just mentioned one, Broadsword, which was a particularly successful album in Europe, but one that didn’t really click in the U.S.A. But the reason for that was to do with the change in radio broadcast formats at that point. A lot of the classic, what were then called AOR [album-oriented rock], stations changed their format, thought they needed to move with the times and started playing alternative 1980s rock. So probably Huey Lewis and Blondie, Billy Idol were getting lots of play but Jethro Tull wasn’t. And after two or three years, as you may know, things changed around again because, basically, that isn’t what a broad sway of the listening audience wanted, and things went back to the old regime. Stations went back to what became then referred to as the classic rock format, and Jethro Tull started getting played a lot again. In 1982, we were not getting much radio play, in 1986 we were getting a lot of radio play with the album Crest of a Knave, which won a Grammy. Not necessarily that we did anything particularly different, it was just the changing format of American radio. The failed experiment to try and ditch the music of the 70s and replace it with the music of 80s, but that isn’t what the public wanted, so most of those stations switched back to being the classic rock stations that we know today.

Maddux: Of which honor are you more proud: the Best Hard Rock/Metal Grammy or the induction into the National Association of Brick Distributors Hall of Fame in 1991?

Anderson: I’m afraid I’m not really one for awards. It’s always nice to be given a peer group award by people who are in the business, which, of course, applies to the Grammys. But it’s a bit like chart positions. I think there’s a terrible danger that people take it all too seriously and start to fret that they don’t see the conspicuous signs of success. Frankly, I know who I am and I know what I do, so I don’t really need to be reminded by hanging things on the wall that tell me what a clever chap I am. It just doesn’t really play a role in my life at all. Looking around the walls I don’t see anything that’s remotely of that sort of thing. It’s not that I disregard it or don’t take it seriously. It’s just that I don’t feel the need to have them on display or even really think about them. I could put several letters after my name if I wanted to be a bit pompous. You know, I could add Doctor of Literature twice, I could add MBE after my name, but of course I don’t because it would be seen as a bit pompous. It’s silly, really. But I know people who do have such awards, whether they’re honorary doctorates or Queen’s awards, and they actually do put them up after their name, and they’re very proud of it. That’s up to them to do, but I think I would feel a little silly if I did that.

Maddux: I take it, then, that you are not particularly keen on becoming a member of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame?

Anderson: Well, I’m rather keen on not being in it because it is the American rock and roll hall of fame. It’s there, as far as I’m concerned to celebrate American music and American artists. It may include people who are heavily influenced by American music but aren’t American citizens. But I think Jethro Tull doesn’t really fit because we’re neither American citizens nor is the music we play – or most of the music that we’ve played since our first album – really influenced by American music, certainly no more so and much less so than classical music or folk music of European origin. So I don’t think we really qualify on any grounds to be in the American rock and roll hall of fame. I can think of a lot of American artists that ought to be celebrated in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame long before they scrape the bottom of the barrel to find Jethro Tull.

Maddux: Do you think that there are some best of-worthy numbers Homo Erraticus?

Anderson: Well, I certainly hope so otherwise I wouldn’t dare release it, would I? It’s music that I’ve written, arranged, recorded, produced in the same ways I have all of the albums that have been released simply under the Jethro Tull banner. So to me it’s another day at the office. It’s what I do. (laughs) I don’t think it’s better or worse or indeed any different except that it’s not going out under the name Jethro Tull because I tend to use my own passport name most of the time these days when I’m doing performances.

Maddux: What is it like to work with Steven Wilson on both your new material and the remastering of the Jethro Tull back catalog?

Anderson: We have a good understanding of the way each other work after doing several albums together. Largely he can get on with things and the way he would do it is present everything in a kind of roughed-out format. I would listen to it all, make some comments, maybe go to the studio and sit with him for a few hours and we would change a few things, move a things around a little bit, and I’d leave him to it again and he’d send me some more stuff to listen to. It’s a well-worn pattern, so it’s just quite easy when you have a way of working with somebody that you can, you know, you can second-guess to some extent what the other person’s going to do or think. Having done several albums with Steven it’s just kind of easy for us both to work together and it doesn’t require a vast amount of input from me. But of course, ultimately he wants to make sure I’m happy with everything and so we do spend time together.

Maddux: Dave Mattacks, a former drummer for Jethro Tull, lives in Marblehead, a town not far from Lynn. Do you plan to see him?

Anderson: Well I haven’t been in touch with Dave Mattacks for a while. I do remember he turned up somewhere where we played, I think in Boston, at a concert a few years ago. It was good to see him and, as always, to hear what he’s been doing and what he’s up to. But, I doubt if the email address that I have for Dave Mattacks is one that still works. Like many people that I’ve worked with over the years, they pop up from time to time and it’s always good to see them. But I haven’t received any requests for tickets or passes or whatever from Dave Mattacks and I wouldn’t really know how to go about getting in touch with him if I did.

But, you know, we’re not there on vacation. As I say, it’s another day in the office. You come through my office door, it’s business only. I’ve got a full day schedule, so I’m not really there to hang out. People who enter my workspace, they better have a damn good reason to be there. I’m not there to, you know, have a little drinky or celebrate old times. We’re very, VERY busy from the load-in in the morning until the load-out at night, everybody is pretty much flat-out. No one has time to hang out with buddies, old or new. So it’s not a good time for meeting up with folks. My meet-and-greet responsibilities are usually with media people that I owe something to. One in a while there are some friends or family or people that crop up that I always feel very embarrassed or short-changed by the fact that I only have a couple of minutes to say hello, and that’s it.

Ian Anderson at Lynn Auditorium, Saturday November 1. Doors at 6:30 p.m., show at 8 p.m. Tickets are available through Ticketmaster ($47 – $87, plus fees), at the box office during City Hall business hours, or by calling (781) 599-SHOW.

Friday Flashback: In the City by The Jam

The three paramount British bands of 1977 stood out among one another by emphasizing an individual aspect of the punk movement more than its peers did. The Sex Pistols focused on anger to a greater extent than politics. The Clash put politics just a notch above anger. The Jam, meanwhile, incorporated pop and R&B–i.e., mod–elements into its social and political commentary.

Related image

In the City is the least revered of the debut albums by these groups. However, it established its creators’ punk credentials every bit as much as Never Mind the Bullocks and The Clash’s debut did for their creators. The Jam was not as angry or overtly political as the Pistols or The Clash, but were enough of each such that, when it stirred in sharp pop hooks and R&B grooves, the result was just as much of a tinderbox.

Image result for the jam 1977

The Jam (l-r): Bruce Foxton, Rick Buckler, Paul Weller

Among the dozen songs on The Jam’s debut are 10 originals by the still 18-year-old Paul Weller, who was two years younger than Johnny Rotten and six years Joe Strummer’s junior. His youth manifests itself mostly for better throughout the record. People who might compare In the City unfavorably to other punk albums cannot legitimately reduce its alleged inferiority to the fact that Weller was a mere pup at the time.


The songs on In the City can be grouped three or four at a time into the categories of punk, mod, and rock. An example of each of these is presented on the first “side” of the album. “Art School” kicks down the door with as much brains, brawn, and urgency as can be found on a late 70s punk album. It is driven by Pete Townshend-inspired riffs that define The Jam’s early sound. “I’ve Changed My Address,” however, emphasizes a mod-loving R&B groove made punky by Rick Buckler’s steady drum beats and Bruce Foxton’s funky bass lines. It kind of sounds like a lost R&B nugget, and lyrically recalls The Who’s “A Legal Matter.” “Away From the Numbers” is a more straight-ahead rocker with thoughtful if not profound lyrics. The tempo is slower on this catchy tune, which has an almost Beach Boys-like “oooh-oooh” interlude.

“In The City” is the album’s literal and figurative centerpiece. While it stands out because it was The Jam’s first single, it is really just another one of many great songs on the album. An equally proportional pop/punk mix and an infectious riff stolen by The Sex Pistols make it a worthy inclusion among the defining songs of the punk era.

The second half of the record–including the title track and its B-side, “Time For Truth”–reinforces the elements introduced in first half. “Sounds From the Street” is the album’s catchiest rock song, and includes a shout out to the band’s hometown: “I know I come from Woking/And you say I’m a fraud/But my heart’s in the city/Where it belongs.”

In addition to Weller’s 10 originals, In the City includes two covers. The first is a punked-up version of Larry Williams’ “Slow Down,” which had also been done by The Beatles. The second is “Batman Theme,” which accounts for the album’s one truly unforgivable dud. This is the earliest instance in which Weller’s love of The Who counts against him a bit. It is one of a few songs that were covered by The Who and then by The Jam, in addition to the Who originals that The Jam covered. Plus, The Who had a song called “In The City,” which I cannot say for sure was the source this album’s title.

Part of me wants to think that The Jam’s lack of success in America can be explained by a sentiment expressed in “Art School”: “Fools only laugh `cause they envy you.” This probably isn’t fair. The fact is that The Jam was simply not marketed effectively in the States. That they were the opening act for Blue Oyster Cult on an early American tour suffices to make that obvious.

No worries though, as The Jam was the most popular band in England during its six-year existence. Unlike The Sex Pistols, Paul Weller’s band was able to survive for long enough to record more than one album. Unlike Joe Strummer or Mick Jones, Paul Weller knew that it was time to hang it up before his band began to look ridiculous.

(“Look ridiculous is exactly what he did in The Style Council,” you say? Maybe, but that is an argument for another review.)